From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 14 09:43:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627126E9; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124E18FC15; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40BB8A412; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAE9h10L007100; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:43:01 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Garrett Cooper Subject: Re: [RFC] test layout/standardization for FreeBSD In-reply-to: From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" References: Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:43:01 +0000 Message-ID: <7099.1352886181@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: George Neville-Neil , Marcel Moolenaar , Matthew Fleming , "freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Arch" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:43:09 -0000 -------- In message , Garrett Cooper writes: >I asked for feedback from some of the stakeholders of >the FreeBSD test automation effort [...] Can I throw in something here ? A very important thing is to have systematic metadata about test-cases, in particular: A) Is the test 100% deterministic, or is there a risk of random failure ? B) Is the test reliable on a heavily loaded machine ? C) Estimated duration of test etc. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.