Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:59:27 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Architectures with strict alignment? Message-ID: <20071230075927.GJ40785@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20071229220628.0E9CD5B2E@mail.bitblocks.com> References: <20071229214644.GY40785@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20071229220628.0E9CD5B2E@mail.bitblocks.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sk71+Upln2BLuDmg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 02:06:27PM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote: >> (though the AMD29K could apparently generate >> dummy bus cycles to limit the number of bit transitions on any cycle >> to reduce the I/O load). > >Are you sure it was the amd29k? I don't recall anything like >that (and am too lazy to dig out its datasheets!). Maybe I'm mis-remembering - it was a long time ago. Other possibility is the M88K. I can't quickly find anything to backup my memory. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --Sk71+Upln2BLuDmg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHd0/f/opHv/APuIcRAqYKAKCkrvJr8BMopDswvDKFL3Acl5MfsgCghI7k EOR1w/RGtwailtywgUxmIw8= =vyBw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sk71+Upln2BLuDmg--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071230075927.GJ40785>