From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 14:14:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52316106564A; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:14:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [IPv6:2a01:170:102f::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9548FC18; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7BEEMZj035107; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:14:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o7BEEMIr035105; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:14:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) From: Oliver Fromme Message-Id: <201008111414.o7BEEMIr035105@lurza.secnetix.de> To: blackend@FreeBSD.ORG (Marc Fonvieille) Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:14:22 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20100811135825.GA1569@gothic.blackend.org> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.4 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:14:37 +0200 (CEST) Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/115232: [ata] Audio CD tracks not displayed properly by X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:14:39 -0000 Marc Fonvieille wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 03:39:06PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > I'm afraid I don't use KDE or GNOME, so I can't tell for sure. > > But it's certainly possible that they do it in a similar way > > as windows. > > Ok, I was just curious :) > > To come back to the PR, I think we can close it since it's not a dd(1) > or ata(4) problem and a "workaround" is already present in the Handbook. Yes, I agree. The problem cannot be solved properly (and without possibly causing unwanted side-effects) in FreeBSD's driver. So this PR can be closed. If a desktop system or application (or part thereof) decides to use polling to detect disk changes, then that's ok (as long as the user has a way to disable it). But this is beyond the scope of the FreeBSD base system. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M. Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung: secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün- chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Blogging: Never before have so many people with so little to say said so much to so few.