From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 19:21:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4353716A410 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA12B13C478 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2008 14:21:23 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OLE25139; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:21:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2008 14:20:20 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18364.32215.660145.662502@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:21:59 -0500 To: Dominic Fandrey In-Reply-To: <47BC7A3C.9070002@bsdforen.de> References: <200802161142.53044.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <20080216215521.GB12555@osiris.chen.org.nz> <18359.26373.750798.755610@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <47BC7A3C.9070002@bsdforen.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Robert Huff , questions@freebsd.org, Jonathan Chen , Steven Friedrich Subject: Re: Shutdown anomaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:21:23 -0000 Dominic Fandrey writes: > >> It's an interleaved buffer messages on SMP systems. The problem is > >> known, but I haven't heard of a proposed solution yet. > > > > There is no fix. > > The workaround is to increase the size of the kernel printf() > > buffer. I don't remember how you do that ... but this is not a new > > issue - chech the archives for details. > > I would like to propose a fix. Care to test it? Me personally? No. Don't have an SMP machine available. Robert Huff