From owner-freebsd-sparc Thu Nov 21 12:54:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE83A37B401; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:54:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [193.111.112.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E810043E88; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 12:54:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.6/8.12.6/ZEIST.DE) with ESMTP id gALKsfGF086210; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:54:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gALKsa0M086209; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:54:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 21:54:36 +0100 From: marius@alchemy.franken.de To: Oliver Blasnik Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Smith Subject: Re: Fw: [PATCH] HME (Happy Meal Ethernet) and T1/105... Message-ID: <20021121205436.GC30274@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <007601c29168$dfdaa5f0$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com> <20021121154405.GB30274@newtrinity.zeist.de> <00d401c29189$f707b620$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00d401c29189$f707b620$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 07:13:28PM +0100, Oliver Blasnik wrote: > > The chip itself has "1216F" printed on, nothing like "6612". As I found > no datasheet for it I asked a friend of mine for register compatibility. > He told me "like 83840". > maybe he meant as far as ieee 802.3u goes ? > The OUI and Model numbers are the same for both the 1216F probed and > the 6612 specs. Should be the same chip, then. > mine has also "1216F" printed on it but as lucent/agere doesn't list that model and the model-id matches the one in the lu6612 datasheet i assumed it got relabeled or something. however, the lu6612 datasheet lists 0x7641 as the value for the mr3-register on page 14 whereas it lists 0x000c for the model-id on page 17. i think 0x7641 is totally bogus as it even doesn't match the oui-bits in mr3 for that lucent oui. > > Now, after I inspected the 6612 datasheet, there is nothing special > to support (possibly the 10mbit-mode: "extended line length"), so > someone can live with the default support and ukphy. Somewhat like > a "genphy" device would be nice instead the uk (its more a generic > driver in my opinion), at least for printing out KNOWN device > information (which can't come from a ukphy = unknown phy driver). > well, the bsd-mii-way seems to be to have drivers for the known ones and copy&paste the generic-bits... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message