From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Nov 24 11:12:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from cypherpunks.cryptohill.net (sub-168ip36.carats.net [216.152.168.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C1C37B421 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 11:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from jeroen (sub-168ip56.carats.net [216.152.168.56]) by cypherpunks.cryptohill.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51041C900; Sat, 24 Nov 2001 15:08:24 -0400 (AST) From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" To: "'Matthew Dillon'" , "'Kirk McKusick'" Cc: "'Sheldon Hearn'" , Subject: RE: Using a larger block size on large filesystems Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 15:08:22 -0400 Message-ID: <004501c1751b$63239e50$38a898d8@cryptohill.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 In-Reply-To: <200111241845.fAOIjM377587@apollo.backplane.com> Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Nice to hear that non-experts like me will be getting good defaults! <> Is it worth printing this (or a variation) as a diagnostic when newfs is invoked with a larger setting? It would help those who learn by trial-and-error. It may even prevent an unfavourable benchmark report in the future: "FreeBSD performance lousy for 4K/32K filesystem." "Duh, newfs told you so!" Cheers, -J To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message