Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:38:40 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: danial_thom@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon) Message-ID: <20061012183840.4313a679.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <20061012141930.41607.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061012152206.cttnwklqb4s00s8g@webmail.leidinger.net> <20061012141930.41607.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 07:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com> wrote: > Maybe its just time for the entire FreeBSD team > to come out of its world of delusion and come to > terms with what every real-life user of FreeBSD > knows: In how ever many years of development, > there is still no good reason to use anything > other than FreeBSD 4.x except that 4.x doesn't This statement is way too broad, I as a FreeBSD user can vouch for FreeBSD 6.x - it works in most situations. > The right thing to do is to port the SATA support > and new NIC support back to 4.x and support both. Go ahead - there is nothing stopping you. > Come to terms with it, > PLEASE, because it is the case and saying > otherwise won't change it. >From wher I'm sitting (and I'm just a FreeBSD user), it is you who have to come to terms with the annouced EOL for 4.x > My prediction is that a year from now we'll all > be using DragonflyBSD and you guys will be > looking for a new bunch of beta-test guinea pigs. We'll see. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061012183840.4313a679.torfinn.ingolfsen>