From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 22 6:21:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx.nkm.lt (mx.nkm.lt [193.219.211.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E75B637B894 for ; Sat, 22 Jul 2000 06:21:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from midom@dammit.lt) Received: (qmail 13784 invoked by uid 1073); 22 Jul 2000 13:20:11 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jul 2000 13:20:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 15:20:11 +0200 (CEST) From: Domas Mituzas X-Sender: midom@mx.nkm.lt To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: .mk should know more ;-) [proposal] Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, recent bento X11 failures proved, that still there are incomplete areas in ports system. There should be variable, that specifies whether /sys or other /usr/src parts should be required in order to build a port. If X libraries are not installed, the port is installed, anyway, here should be warning. That would solve inconveniences in present and future ports. Thanks, Domas Mituzas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message