Date: Sun, 19 Dec 1999 09:56:30 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm), robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for objections: extended attribute and ACL interfaces Message-ID: <5383.945593790@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 18 Dec 1999 20:05:04 GMT." <199912182005.NAA01764@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199912182005.NAA01764@usr08.primenet.com>, Terry Lambert writes: >Peter, it should work without any handlers being present. At the >FreeBSDCon, Kirk agreed that the vfs_default.c stuff damaged the >abstraction between UFS and FFS layers, which are supposed to be >seperated as block management policy and directory hierarchy policy >layers. Ask Matt Dillon or Poul-Henning. Terry, the interface between UFS and FFS isn't a vnode interface, it is an *I*node interface. It shouldn't use VOPs at all. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5383.945593790>