From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org  Tue May 31 13:10:24 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72025B55313
 for <freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D72D11A2
 for <freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id 5CCDFB55312; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C714B55311
 for <gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D17E11A1
 for <gnome@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4VDAObV069696
 for <gnome@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: gnome@FreeBSD.org
Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 209870] multiple ports: Building
 manpages with xsltproc --nonet is failing
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Type: request
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: 
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? maintainer-feedback?
Message-ID: <bug-209870-6497-RDYWHQDVEl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-209870-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-209870-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining
 <freebsd-gnome.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-gnome>,
 <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gnome/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome>,
 <mailto:freebsd-gnome-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:10:24 -0000

Vladimir Krstulja <vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com> has asked gnome@FreeBSD.org =
for
maintainer-feedback:
Bug 209870: multiple ports: Building manpages with xsltproc --nonet is fail=
ing
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209870



--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Krstulja <vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com> ---
I wasn't comfortable pinging multiple maintainers for a single PR, but it l=
ooks
like it's just two. I'd advise separating such issues into own PRs, it's ea=
sier
to track and we can name individual ports in the summary so they're easily
searched for issues.

BTW, as a quick test I looked at security/libsecret thinking it'll pull in
least amount of deps, but that port does not have any patches nor a files
directory. Are these fixes against the latest SVN head?