From owner-cvs-all Fri Jan 26 4:17:50 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from pcnet1.pcnet.com (pcnet1.pcnet.com [204.213.232.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822DC37B698; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 04:17:29 -0800 (PST) Received: (from eischen@localhost) by pcnet1.pcnet.com (8.8.7/PCNet) id HAA03883; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:17:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 07:17:00 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen To: Jason Evans Cc: Daniel Eischen , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc Makefile In-Reply-To: <20010125202728.E87569@canonware.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 25 Jan 2001, Jason Evans wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 06:27:06PM -0800, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > deischen 2001/01/25 18:27:06 PST > > > > Modified files: > > lib/libc Makefile > > Log: > > Comment change only; s/_thread_sys_/__sys_/ > > Ew, this reminds me: we have IMPLEMENTATION NOTES in lots of man pages that > mention _thread_sys_*(), which now needs to be updated. I know, but I'm not sure yet what to do for those. I want to get rid of fd locking altogether by the threads library. FILE will have a lock and be MT-safe, but I don't see any need to have the threads library provide locking for fds; it should be up to the application. Do we even want to mention that some calls are renamed to __sys_foo? -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message