From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:44:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458971065673; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F778FC19; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.30.101.53] ([209.117.142.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q0DIeEVV053066 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:40:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:40:09 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <35B3C9CE-0D58-4DDC-AE6D-A6EF450DF39D@bsdimp.com> References: <4F08C95F.6040808@FreeBSD.org> <20120108.081216.1547061187942402256.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F0A22D8.8090206@FreeBSD.org> <20120109.223510.1979757999064039809.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F0FFFF7.4090105@FreeBSD.org> <20120113141058.GE1662@garage.freebsd.pl> <20120113171255.GA1694@garage.freebsd.pl> To: Chris Rees X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (harmony.bsdimp.com [10.0.0.6]); Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:40:17 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, Doug Barton , Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: Making use of set_rcvar. X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:44:28 -0000 On Jan 13, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Chris Rees wrote: > Also, I tend to agree with Doug on the <> issue. > If we really want to reuse code like that then we need to start using > m4 or something (I'm only being half facetious here). Well, nothing is keeping us from having foo.m4 as our source and = compiling it into foo... Except maybe the fact that m4 makes my eyeballs bleed (I did do my = resume with m4 none-the-less :) Warner