From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 1 03:00:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5542016A4CE; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:00:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AEA43D1F; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 03:00:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (scottl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i812xfZK074406; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:59:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (scottl@localhost)i812xfGX074403; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:59:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pooker.samsco.org: scottl owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 20:59:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Scott Long Sender: scottl@pooker.samsco.org To: Jun Kuriyama In-Reply-To: <7mpt561yuv.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> Message-ID: <20040831205913.I59291@pooker.samsco.org> References: <200408301551.i7UFpY8V006948@repoman.freebsd.org> <413356AB.5050306@freebsd.org> <7mpt561yuv.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org cc: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/misc pci_vendors X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 03:00:01 -0000 On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:32:43 -0600, > Scott Long wrote: > > > Log: > > > MFC rev 1.31: regen > > > > > > Revision Changes Path > > > 1.30.2.1 +146 -21 src/share/misc/pci_vendors > > > > I'm quite surprised that the CVS scripts didn't require you to > > put an 'Approved by' line here. Is something broken? > > Hmm, I checked with same file, branch and log message in my repo, but > it worked as I suppose. But the commit log proves something broken... > > Maybe committing directly from freefall circumvents the checks? Scott