Date: Sat, 7 Sep 2024 13:23:11 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD+samba as a time machine server for OSX/Sonoma? Message-ID: <f424330f-fbf1-49fe-9ced-fb05714af271@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <0.2.0-final-1725702660.839-0xb11c62@qmda.emu.st> References: <c7183af3-4a8b-4f12-848f-09f11e8b0e8f@freebsd.org> <8E0CDC45-6521-4973-A349-9B5824C75863@freebsd.org> <0.2.0-final-1725702660.839-0xb11c62@qmda.emu.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/7/24 11:51, Mark Delany wrote: > I'm going to ask a silly question here. But why are people running samba instead of > netatalk if they are only using the timemachine backup capability? A couple of possibilities: _ they already have Samba and don't feel like installing something extra when the former is supposed to work; _ if I understand correctly AFPS is deprecated by Apple, which suggests SMB instead. bye av. P.S. I don't use Samba directly for TM, although I have a customer taking TM backups to a NAS, which almost surely runs Samba.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f424330f-fbf1-49fe-9ced-fb05714af271>