Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:28:25 +0100 From: Oliver Lehmann <lehmann@ans-netz.de> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/wmauda Makefile ports/audio/xmp Makefile ports/audio/mp3splt-gtk Makefile ports/audio/audacious-dumb Makefile ports/multimedia/tunapie Makefile ports/multimedia/xfce4-xmms-plugin Makefile ports/sysutils/conky ... Message-ID: <20110304132825.69583zfq7lvftuio@avocado.salatschuessel.net> In-Reply-To: <58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru> References: <201103041043.p24AhwQ8023264@repoman.freebsd.org> <28478789@h30.sp.ipt.ru> <20110304130842.119715ssjn44nps8@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <58879204@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Boris, Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: > Hi Oliver, > > On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 13:08:42 +0100 Oliver Lehmann wrote: >> Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: >> > >> > Was PORTREVISION bump really needed for those ports? > >> They have a hard or optional dependency to audacious so in my opinion - yes. > > I'm not sure what you do mean. What's the "hard" and "optional" > dependency? And what changed at the main port that those dependent > ports in your opinion should be bumped? With hard I mean the port is depending on audacious with no option to disable that. With optional I mean you could disable the audacious dependency via a make switch. The main port itself changed so it is advised to recompile the depending ports as otherwise the depending ports would have still the old version of audacious recorded as a dependency but this old version is no longer installed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110304132825.69583zfq7lvftuio>