From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 03:32:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239C01065676; Fri, 25 May 2012 03:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from araujobsdport@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C298FC0C; Fri, 25 May 2012 03:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so347357yhg.13 for ; Thu, 24 May 2012 20:32:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=yxfLhDqDxSNVvPvLDbvpWc/W449aAYXh/hPcfnPr23A=; b=x1nkobyrQpzWv1ja1UmKPRMI8UcUZBf7xSJuRubMf+g1mN4zRnAxvg82R46Aa8GQEx YecrQzxcPO9M+xDKNTxUGz1RdkKF5Yd0GatofhpedzjuwFKQ1uNCZFFGilzej074s7hh SotFZmaCeujilXCS1IoXf6iULk3RqmVwx6GcpXA7e0j4WbFcs4eX5rYEHvRrJEqM1i1H SqC7tHlvmV3mH4TtcXGhkoXQ1L+xM8hHbMZWTf/X69GMt9tcxKcdJqXoOQb7PLTPoYSD 4BcEHlhObGYuFuHoO4imjUEUH5M2ODJt7X+Q/k0MWq/eRuXQzcWu6MR4C+FSHll/oWlE 5cxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.171.69 with SMTP id as5mr1175589igc.72.1337916732412; Thu, 24 May 2012 20:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.244.8 with HTTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 20:32:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201205210632.q4L6WPI9081702@repoman.freebsd.org> <20120521143623.34087c13.miwi@FreeBSD.org> <4FB9E411.9030500@FreeBSD.org> <20120521070444.GG63744@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:32:12 +0800 Message-ID: From: Marcelo Araujo To: Eitan Adler Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , miwi@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Dmitry Sivachenko , cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/haproxy Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: araujo@FreeBSD.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 03:32:14 -0000 2012/5/25 Eitan Adler > On 24 May 2012 19:03, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > > OK Eitan, > > > > I need to say sorry to everybody, because for security issues, I never > have > > asked anyone for approvals in case there is a maintainer time out. > > My BAD! > > Note that security fixes may cause their own problems (the fix breaks > everything else?). This is why explicit approval is needed. The > maintainer should usually be contacted but in extreme cases portmgr or > so may approve as well. (IMHO it should be expanded to secteam... but > meh) > > Well, we are talking specifically in the case of haproxy. It doesn't break anything right, does it? So, I do believe there is no problem with that commit. Best Regards, -- Marcelo Araujo araujo@FreeBSD.org