Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 19:25:20 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, "David E. O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Overriding compiler flags (Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc.295 gcc.c) Message-ID: <20010530192520.H74837@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105302323390.18042-100000@besplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:27:46PM %2B1000 References: <20010529040250.A81586@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0105302323390.18042-100000@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 11:27:46PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Tue, 29 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > Hmm. We now have a number of ways of achieving this (some of these > > only work in some contexts): > > > > Defining CFLAGS with ?= instead of = in /etc/make.conf > > This is a no-op, because CFLAGS is always defined in /etc/make.conf. This is not a no-op, if CFLAGS is already defined in the environment or on the make(1) command line. A CFLAGS=.. line in /etc/make.conf is a lot less user-friendly than a CFLAGS?=.. line. G'luck, Peter -- When you are not looking at it, this sentence is in Spanish. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010530192520.H74837>