From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Nov 11 01:50:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFC3A2AA8D for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 01:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A41013D6; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 01:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92898B95B; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:50:58 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: NGie Cooper , remko@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Revisiting "Bug 46062 - Remove skel from BSD.root.dist" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 10:20:25 -0800 Message-ID: <1580231.TzCMMyCl6z@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:50:58 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 01:50:59 -0000 On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 02:22:10 AM NGie Cooper wrote: > Hi again, > =09I did some digging around and found a past discussion started by r= emko on the topic of removing /usr/share/skel 8 years ago: https://list= s.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2007-November/007162.html . The di= scussion didn=E2=80=99t yield anything (unfortunately) as far as whethe= r or not the directory should be removed (it=E2=80=99s empty right now)= . /etc/skel is used by Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and Solaris for skeleton= files; FreeBSD uses /usr/share/skel instead. Should the path be linked= to /usr/share/skel or deleted (potential patch here: https://people.fr= eebsd.org/~ngie/remove-etc-skel.patch )? Removing /etc/skel you mean? It's empty, but /usr/share/skel is not em= pty. Does anything outside of the base system use /etc/skel or /usr/share/sk= el? --=20 John Baldwin