Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:51:38 +0100 From: "Torfinn Ingolfsen" <tingox@gmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amule 2.2.3 port - ready for test Message-ID: <ef8c8a880901191151o47af0472xfc4f22f851b012de@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6f7772b758928744df0348d5fdb21973.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> References: <ef8c8a880901091823w7cd4a797g30d70044478e60d3@mail.gmail.com> <20090110162025.3fa38c70@chii.bluelife.at> <ef8c8a880901100828m5df08012leb05554f2287268e@mail.gmail.com> <39b650464a96fa082375cd320c27299d.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <ef8c8a880901180405madc0c5bw3e3a218afcad825b@mail.gmail.com> <6f7772b758928744df0348d5fdb21973.squirrel@webmail.itac.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Bernhard Fr=F6hlich <decke@bluelife.at> wr= ote: > To be exact tinderbox complains about some directories that you have > removed but you shouldn't. So just remove these lines from pkg-plist and > tinderbox should be happy with it. I understand that, but I don't understand the difference between the handling of fr, pt_PT and the other locales.. Here is an example. the port install the following files: share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/amule.mo share/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES/amule.mo share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/amule.mo (I verified this by doing tar tvf on the package archive) The last two are the ones tinderbox complains about, the first one (and all the others) doesn't get complaints from your tinderbox. Here is the corresponding lines in pkg-plist: share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/amule.mo share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/amule.mo share/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES/amule.mo followed by these lines later in pkg-plist: @dirrmtry share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES @dirrmtry share/locale/da @dirrmtry share/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES @dirrmtry share/locale/fr_FR @dirrmtry share/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES @dirrmtry share/locale/pt_PT There must be something wrong here, since tinderbox complains, but I just can't see the error / problem. > portlint and port-tools are great tools for a quick check but a tinderbox > can detect a lot more errors because it builds the ports in a clean > environment so none of them can replace one another. Use them in > combination and you catch most of the errors. Yes, I am still trying to get my tinderbox working again. --=20 Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef8c8a880901191151o47af0472xfc4f22f851b012de>