From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 17 08:42:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6AB16A4CE for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:42:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12D9C43D2D for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:42:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@root.org) Received: (qmail 29760 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Feb 2004 16:42:04 -0000 Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:42:04 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: Jun Kuriyama In-Reply-To: <7m3c99vp6i.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> Message-ID: <20040217083910.M29569@root.org> References: <200401192127.i0JLRBL3041817@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040213035557.M24031@gamplex.bde.org> <20040215094444.F6303@gamplex.bde.org> <7m3c99vp6i.wl@black.imgsrc.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Bruce Evans Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha support.s src/sys/i386/i386 swtch.s src/sys/kern kern_shutdown.c src/sys/sys systm.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:42:04 -0000 On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:53:25 +1100 (EST), > Bruce Evans wrote: > > > I also think that commit is not so useful, but there are some > > > supporters for his modification. Do you want to back out this > > > completely? Or fixing just style bugs are acceptable? > > > > Fixing the style bugs and other bugs, and adding an option (off by > > default) to control it would be acceptable. Backing it out would > > be easier. > > I think an option which is off by default would not be accepted by > Poul-Henning. > > I re-read all of this thread and collect opinions. > > pls back out: bde,nate,wpaul,danfe@nsu.ru > good: phk,kientzle,grog > positive: silby > negative: jhb,kuriyama > > This does not include private emails to Poul-Henning and I don't think > we should decide something with above. That's just FYI. > > But I personally feel this should be back out after re-reading and we > should tackle traceback() improvements. > > Sorry my stupid, but it seems everyone seems happy if traceback() > improvement happens. Is that really too hard to go forward? Thanks for the summary. I already committed the backtrace() patch on Jan. 27th that makes it use printf when not in the debugger. It was by Ian Dowse. http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=588156+0+archive/2004/cvs-all/20040208.cvs-all -Nate