From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Dec 17 21:25:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA19321 for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:25:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation) Received: from mail-gw.pacbell.net (mail-gw.pacbell.net [206.13.28.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA19316 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:25:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from schluntz@pacbell.net) Received: from [206.170.30.53] (ppp-206-170-30-53.hywr01.pacbell.net [206.170.30.53]) by mail-gw.pacbell.net (8.8.8/8.7.1+antispam) with SMTP id VAA17675 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:25:12 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199712180525.VAA17675@mail-gw.pacbell.net> Subject: Linux LKM Emulation Question Date: Wed, 17 Dec 97 21:28:28 -0700 x-sender: schluntz@postoffice.pacbell.net x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v2, June 6, 1997 From: "Sean J. Schluntz" To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I have a question about the speed difference between the Linux LKM and the kernel option for Linux. I'm going to be running at least one program a lot on my system that is a Linux program (Executor the Mac emulator) and I have 64megs of RAM. Will I seen any speed increase by building Linux in to the FreeBSD kernel (v2.2.5) over using the LKM, or should I stick with the LKM? Thanks for your time! -Sean ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Sean J. Schluntz schluntz@pinpt.com Systems Engineer (408) 997-6900 x222 PinPoint Software Corporation http://www.pinpt.com