From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 24 12:51:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5798516A4CE; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035E443D48; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:51:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004032420515701100k3f7be>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:51:58 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA65104; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:55:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:55:16 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20040324195338.GC8779@dragon.nuxi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD current users cc: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:51:59 -0000 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:36:35PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > TLS is "kernel invisible" (other than what we have already done to make > > %gs point where we need it.) ((or the equivalent in other > > architectures) > > so there is no kernel work.. > > Uh, who is going to investigate the situation on the other platforms and > make any needed changes? Lack of that is also a deal breaker. I won't > participate in TLS if it is going to be yet another feature that makes > our platforms not on equal footing. The other platform's KSE frameworks have been developed with TLS support already included. We already do all the kernel work that we need to (or at worst have done it in a way that the TLS support 'slots in'). I was just using X86 as an example. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >