Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 12:55:16 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241253310.63489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20040324195338.GC8779@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:36:35PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > TLS is "kernel invisible" (other than what we have already done to make > > %gs point where we need it.) ((or the equivalent in other > > architectures) > > so there is no kernel work.. > > Uh, who is going to investigate the situation on the other platforms and > make any needed changes? Lack of that is also a deal breaker. I won't > participate in TLS if it is going to be yet another feature that makes > our platforms not on equal footing. The other platform's KSE frameworks have been developed with TLS support already included. We already do all the kernel work that we need to (or at worst have done it in a way that the TLS support 'slots in'). I was just using X86 as an example. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241253310.63489-100000>