Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Is ZFS production ready?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu%2B-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com> <CAPj0R5Kmi-%2BdJ7mPvTrTAoS8O983svOyR2WyK2_v1Cr07dSS_A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211413140.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhuQ%2BbxKW9%2BdX%2BzS9mErwz8JSkV2G7qL0KfB8BH_LGJAgA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211539230.2903@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvR_eKtVxdKcaMyOS7tLw_AOHKgUy3o7mJn2b=chMA0Xw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211619250.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CA%2BD9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu%2B-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>
>>
> interesting idea but the options ZFS would give you are superior to this
> setup.

Were you just unable to understand my setup or a reasons to do this?

please reread former post and possibly ask again if you don't understand 
the reasons.

I ignore performance issues completely for now.

> But I have still not seen any evidence/facts that ZFS looses more
> data than UFS.

And you've never seen me, yet i still exist.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170>