From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 21 14:47:04 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA1B1065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473AA8FC08
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:47:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5LEl1rV003279;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5LEl1RL003276; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+D9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu+-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211644350.3170@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FE2CE38.9000100@gmail.com>
	<CAPj0R5Kmi-+dJ7mPvTrTAoS8O983svOyR2WyK2_v1Cr07dSS_A@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211413140.2263@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+D9QhuQ+bxKW9+dX+zS9mErwz8JSkV2G7qL0KfB8BH_LGJAgA@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211539230.2903@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+D9QhvR_eKtVxdKcaMyOS7tLw_AOHKgUy3o7mJn2b=chMA0Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206211619250.3092@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+D9QhvwKZm7heoe7tpfhYCJvkknw_HC7aFjCu+-1xYQBmV6ng@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:47:01 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Is ZFS production ready?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 14:47:05 -0000

>>
>>
> interesting idea but the options ZFS would give you are superior to this
> setup.

Were you just unable to understand my setup or a reasons to do this?

please reread former post and possibly ask again if you don't understand 
the reasons.

I ignore performance issues completely for now.

> But I have still not seen any evidence/facts that ZFS looses more
> data than UFS.

And you've never seen me, yet i still exist.