From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Nov 23 15:14:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924D837B401 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:14:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from nemesis.systems.pipex.net (nemesis.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB4843E4A for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 15:14:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (81-86-129-77.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.129.77]) by nemesis.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D2516007FC0; Sat, 23 Nov 2002 23:14:40 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: Port INDEX dependency list incompletes From: Stacey Roberts Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com To: Kent Stewart Cc: Lefteris Tsintjelis , a , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3DDFE4D6.5090901@owt.com> References: <3DDF911D.5FF8F512@ene.asda.gr> <3DDF9EFC.E3B42B5D@ene.asda.gr> <20021123170312.3af58fdd.a@grunix.com> <3DDFA761.D459E000@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFCA8A.40104@owt.com> <3DDFE0AC.57BF260E@ene.asda.gr> <3DDFE4D6.5090901@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1038093287.43256.12.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Date: 23 Nov 2002 23:14:47 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Kent, I wanted to square with you that this is as one would expect from "make index" and "portsdb -u" at the end of cvsup of ports tree: # make index Generating INDEX - please wait..Warning: Duplicate INDEX entry: freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 Done. #portsdb -u [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 7860 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000........ ..... done] # Is the one warning there about freeciv-imlib-1.13.0 being duplicated okay? I ask as this is usually the last entry in my regular portsdb -Uu after cvsup'ing ports tree. Regards, Stacey On Sat, 2002-11-23 at 20:28, Kent Stewart wrote: > Lefteris Tsintjelis wrote: > > Kent Stewart wrote: > > > >>cd /usr/ports > >>make index > >>portsdb -u > > > > > > I get almost always "dependency list incompletes" with portsdb -Uu. > > Would it be a good idea to always use the above instead? > > No, because portsdb -U uses much less computer time to rebuild INDEX > than make index does. On my AMD 2000+ XP, which is designed to do 20 > minute buildworlds, a portsdb -U requires ~7 minutes and a make index > requires ~11 minutes. If you are going to work on your ports, the > extra time is time you just sit there. I find people go into their own > version of an idle-loop after 2 minutes. > > We just have to wait for knu to fix it. > > KEnt -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message