From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Oct  8 10:31:51 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA07999
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA07983
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 10:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA06171;
	Thu, 8 Oct 1998 19:25:31 +0200 (CEST)
To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= )
cc: Matthew Thyer <thyerm@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>,
        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "08 Oct 1998 18:24:45 +0200."
             <xzpk92byqb6.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no> 
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 1998 19:25:30 +0200
Message-ID: <6169.907867530@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <xzpk92byqb6.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>, Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes:
>> In message <xzpsogzys0f.fsf@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no>, Dag-Erling C. =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes:
>> >Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes:
>> > > In message <199810081342.XAA01038@eddie.dsto.defence.gov.au>, Matthew Thyer writes:
>> > > > So, has FreeBSD-CURRENT's kernel been fixed and can tickadj be removed
>> > > > from the base system ?
>> > > Yes and no.
>> > Care to elaborate, or are we just too stupid to comprehend the depth
>> > of Your Maginificence's explanation?
>> Yes, it has been fixed.
>> No, it hasn't been removed.
>
>The original question was "can tickadj be removed". You answered no.

Sorry, misunderstanding there, yes I think it can be removed.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
"ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message