From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 19:36:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7953C16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:36:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B5543D1D for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 19:36:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan.cojocar@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1111777wra for ; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:36:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=f0pAGlMQ7MJsEqjeD3ZNSojXSQ6F+XmuxvIgAtEWUv6NPX8oPK0b477PKhOEftHjAbjQ3BOAzlOfXFL8zCx7FNzSKMObj04qoUpO3qCwFUN910XwqRnn8FF5vrAoOBWv/EhLzhAWfQMsPnFPu6EQzDuKgCEW1PtE6v5mI3knf+4= Received: by 10.54.52.10 with SMTP id z10mr1710180wrz; Sat, 02 Apr 2005 11:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.26.4 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:36:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:36:24 +0300 From: Dan Cojocar To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <424EF205.6010202@root.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050329154013.B52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330104117.A52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <20050330123458.T52981@lexi.siliconlandmark.com> <424C41C3.50705@root.org> <20050402111839.GA847@h1.d> <424EF205.6010202@root.org> cc: Nate Lawson Subject: Re: Interrupt storm X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan Cojocar List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 19:36:25 -0000 On Apr 2, 2005 10:27 PM, Nate Lawson wrote: > Gleb Kurtsov wrote: > > On (31/03/2005 21:38), Dan Cojocar wrote: > > > >>On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > >> > >>>Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > >>> > >>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:53:48 -0500 (EST), Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Dan Cojocar wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>I tried running GENERIC and i get the following lor and watchdog > >>>>>>>timeout, no interrupt storms: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>--- 8< --- --- 8< --- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.generic > >>>>>>> I tried also my kernel with apic, i don't get interrupt storms but > >>>>>>>i get watchdog timeout message just like with GENERIC. > >>>>>>>Here is the full dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.apic > >>>>>>> And finally i tried my kernel without apic and without acpi, it's > >>>>>>>running just fine, no interrupt storms, no watchdog timeout, but i > >>>>>>>don't have acpi :(, here is the final > >>>>>>>dmesg: http://cs.ubbcluj.ro/~dan/dmesg.txt.noacpi. > > > > if you want to get acpi you have to use old acpi pci link code. > > cd sys/dev/acpica; cvs update -D 23-Nov-2004 -Pd acpi_pci[^.]* > > it works fine for me with recent current. > > I'm a little confused. I don't know of anyone that has problems with > the 6-current PCI irq code that works on 5-stable (which is what your > cvs command updates it to). > > Do either of you have a problem with irq routing on 6-current that works > on 5-stable? Please send details if so. Hello Nate, I'm not using now -stable but i did have for a short period stable installed and i remember that i didn't have any interrupt storm. Maybe i will try to install a -stable version again to see if i remember correct. Thanks, Dan