From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct  1 15:46:30 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432D916A41F;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2005 15:46:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B6B43D46;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2005 15:46:29 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
	[70.30.70.180]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDD51A3C19;
	Sat,  1 Oct 2005 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AA5C451259; Sat,  1 Oct 2005 11:46:28 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 11:46:28 -0400
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Message-ID: <20051001154628.GA64006@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20051001085358.GA62022@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: scottl@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 6.0R todo list - hash sizes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:46:30 -0000


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 10:53:58AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> scottl@ removed:
>     <td>Nullfs (and perhaps other filesystems) use an absurdly small
>      hash size that causes significant performance penalties.</td>
>=20
> this item from 6.0R todo list. How was this solved? I didnt see any commi=
ts
> to enlarge the hash values. Its still the same... why it was removed then?

It was an incorrect suggestion on my part - it turns out this was not
the cause of the performance penalties, and Jeff fixed them long ago.

Kris


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDPq9UWry0BWjoQKURAhnHAKDnPk9l/xrlJhthD37VDdhBCJ4HygCdEXSj
7nkMAkoxy0N9Jbn61dSMRsA=
=bTym
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--