Date: Wed, 06 May 2015 10:13:00 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline Message-ID: <bug-199820-13-vuqJ1ERGTP@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199820-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199820 --- Comment #3 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- it sounds like a nightmare. People are asking for rubygems to be removed in general since they can be installed from outside ports. Can't you package all 96 rubygems in a single port? So they can be installed / removed together? Who wants to commit ~100 ports just to get gitlab? (e.g. why is it vital to have gitlab in ports?) I'd recommend thinking about how to make this maintainable because right now it looks awful. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199820-13-vuqJ1ERGTP>