From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 7 16:34:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849461065679 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w8hdkim@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D60D8FC0A for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so3252161qcs.13 for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:34:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DZvpjtCo1GwlG9vN7Yq5Bvl8sz6m+JJNAI1MBfAjGI0=; b=lWx3kndHOlSl+GRHCrWdwh8nEPrc/y3I9FdEpt6yNmSAznA2gqQYtaAg0ejxDqIXFI 0qpCB3Wq/acHfUhZxO3AmNKZNAaLnfSFCyuxF7zuzcSqxtUa/DiEI7M8ktO4w3V3qZL5 Sul8QVxrJ5dAL5Ai6wAwkTTsigXWH3C3WEs3dcFx0oOPI7mdH+Lx32clUkyB3/qXrlyS saCtyeQiRlpwzrmBfNTy2X2mq0r6AiaWsKx8+/yJNDT4WGmqD0ryMXryjjiTH7LwVgmN M8J++k5K+OwIkwx28vBHPTmGUiQEDTimu9Fey84BfaHInXFRl9bVCP2hMPe6IggD1vz4 1SSg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.134.200 with SMTP id k8mr7376776qct.135.1344357292280; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.39.12 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:34:52 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kim Culhan To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (ANother) stall fixed, please update to HEAD X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:34:53 -0000 On Tue, August 7, 2012 12:00 pm, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 7 August 2012 08:55, Kim Culhan wrote: >> On Mon, August 6, 2012 8:58 pm, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >> >>> I'd appreciate it if users would sync up to -HEAD and try it out. >> >> Looks good, no errors logged > > Sweet. And no traffic stalls, right? No stalls :) > Yup. Would you be able to work with PseudoCylon and test his > ieee80211_iterate_nodes() patch? I'd like verification that it fixes > it for you before I tidy it up and commit it to -HEAD. iter.patch and iter2.patch cannot be applied in that order soo.. PseudoCylon could you please generate a diff against -HEAD from your present local source? Sorry for the inconvenience.. -kim