From owner-cvs-all Wed Nov 13 15:23:29 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0498F37B404; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:23:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84AC43E7B; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:23:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id B836B518FF; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:53:22 +1030 (CST) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 09:53:22 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: David O'Brien , Robert Watson , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/lukemftpd - Imported sources Message-ID: <20021113232322.GP2919@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200211120642.gAC6gfg0043798@repoman.freebsd.org> <20021112171203.GB59816@dragon.nuxi.com> <20021113111030.GA83756@regency.nsu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021113111030.GA83756@regency.nsu.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday, 13 November 2002 at 17:10:30 +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:12:03AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:15:53AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote: >> >>> Lukemftpd *cannot* be the suggested FTPd. >> >> Why?? It works fine for many and I've seen many installations use it >> that find the "regular" ftpd *way* too feature limited for any ftp site >> on the naked Internet. > > AFAIC, regular ftpd is more secure and robust than lukemftpd. I've > seen reports in the past saying that performance issues in lukemftpd > are unavoidable WRT fixing them. Until we get performance and > security up to what we have in ftpd right now, IMHO it's rather > meaningless to compare features. This is the first report of this kind I've heard. Can you supply details? Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message