From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Aug 11 22:51:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA01654
          for ports-outgoing; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 22:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dog.farm.org ([209.1.236.251])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA01645;
          Mon, 11 Aug 1997 22:51:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dk@localhost) by dog.farm.org (8.7.5/dk#3) id WAA09164; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 22:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 22:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dmitry Kohmanyuk <dk@dog.farm.org>
Message-Id: <199708120553.WAA09164@dog.farm.org>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner)
Cc: ache@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ftp.relcom.ru vs. ftp.kiae.su?
Newsgroups: cs-monolit.gated.lists.freebsd.ports
Organization: FARM Computing Association
Reply-To: dk+@ua.net
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Bill Fenner (fenner@parc.xerox.com) wrote:
> I just noticed that ftp.relcom.ru and ftp.kiae.su are the same machine,
> because they appear to have rearranged their FTP area a little.  Does
> it make sense to standardize on one or the other name for use in ports'
> MASTER_SITES?

ftp.kiae.su is almost as sacred for xUSSR Internet as ucbvax.berkeley.edu
or parc.xerox.com ;-), but I think that ftp.relcom.ru is now a better
name for them.  Ache, your voice is last, I think.

(one of ports mentioned is mine)

> Ports that use ftp.relcom.ru:
> archivers/rar
> archivers/unrar
> misc/astrolog
> russian/X.language
> russian/pgp.language

> Ports that use ftp.kiae.su:
> archivers/arc
> archivers/ha
> archivers/zoo
> net/trafshow
> news/nntpbtr
> russian/d1489