From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Mar 31 03:37:20 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA15546 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 03:37:20 -0800
Received: from aut.alcatel.at (dnisun.aut.alcatel.at [146.112.129.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id DAA15530 for <hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 03:37:10 -0800
Received: from atuhc16 ([146.112.128.178]) by aut.alcatel.at (4.1/SMI-4.1/AAA-1.29/main)
	id AA00159; Fri, 31 Mar 95 13:35:27 +0200
Message-Id: <9503311135.AA00159@aut.alcatel.at>
Received: by atuhc16
	(1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA09077; Fri, 31 Mar 1995 13:33:34 +0200
From: Marino Ladavac <Marino.Ladavac@aut.alcatel.at>
Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system.
To: peter@bonkers.taronga.com (Peter da Silva)
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 95 13:33:34 METDST
Cc: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <199503302237.QAA07923@bonkers.taronga.com>; from "Peter da Silva" at Mar 30, 95 4:37 pm
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Peter wrote:
> 
> It seems to be odd to be calling the easy to use documentation the "advanced"
> documentation package. Yes, from our vendor viewpoint that's what it is,
> but it really should be given a friendlier name. Would *you* install an
> "advanced" documentation package if you were a newbie?

What do you think about:

   Manpages etc.:   Administration and Programming Reference Manual

   "Advanced" docs: User Manuals and Tutorials

/Alby