Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:56:00 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: "N.J. Mann" <njm@njm.me.uk> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r194449 - vendor-sys/opensolaris/dist/uts/common/dtrace vendor/opensolaris/dist/cmd/dtrace/test/tst/common/funcs vendor/opensolaris/dist/cmd/sgs/include vendor/opensolaris/dist/lib/libd... Message-ID: <200906191156.00893.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20090618212727.GA22113@titania.njm.me.uk> References: <200906181711.n5IHBOKt017645@svn.freebsd.org> <20090618205149.GA19022@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20090618212727.GA22113@titania.njm.me.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 18 June 2009 5:27:27 pm N.J. Mann wrote: > In message <20090618205149.GA19022@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>, > Peter Jeremy (peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) wrote: > > On 2009-Jun-18 17:11:24 +0000, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote: > > >Author: jhb > > >Date: Thu Jun 18 17:11:24 2009 > > >New Revision: 194449 > > >URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/194449 > > > > Can anyone explain why I have two distinctly different SVN commit > > mails both with the same subject for r194449? r149445 is similar. I > > also have two copies of r149446 but they appear to be identical. > > I was about to ask the same question. Looking at the headers it would > appear they _are_ separate messages. r194449 for example: > > Message-Id: <200906181711.n5IHBOKt017645@svn.freebsd.org> > From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> > Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC) > To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, > svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org > X-SVN-Group: vendor-sys > > Message-Id: <200906181711.n5IHBOPr017629@svn.freebsd.org> > From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> > Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC) > To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, > svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org > X-SVN-Group: vendor > > So, the next question is what is the relevance if X-SVN-Group ? The other thing that stuck out to me was that vendor-sys e-mails claimed the commits to 'vendor' were changes in "other areas also in this revision", but that the vendor e-mails claimed that the entire commit was all in the same area. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200906191156.00893.jhb>