From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 30 11:57:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E10471065695; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from webmaster@kibab.com) Received: from mx0.deglitch.com (backbone.deglitch.com [78.110.53.255]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA548FC19; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kibab-work.smstraffic.ru (unknown [195.94.237.82]) by mx0.deglitch.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4E9858FC4E; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:56:40 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:56:38 +0400 From: Ilya Bakulin To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?Q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Message-ID: <20100830155638.710f8871@kibab-work.smstraffic.ru> In-Reply-To: <86bp8kjr7i.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <86wrry1hwv.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20100828130912.48205a47@kibab.com> <20100828195024.3d671a76@kibab.com> <20100828204415.6875b4ec@kibab.com> <86bp8kjr7i.fsf@ds4.des.no> Organization: ON Labs X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: geom@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for WD Advanced Format disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:57:12 -0000 =D0=92 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:05:37 +0200 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Ilya Bakulin writes: > > So, ad7p1.nop is shifted by 512 bytes and resides right on the > > beginning of the physical sector. And it has 4096 "sector" size. >=20 > Why did you shift the gnop? Did you short jumper 7-8? No, 7-8 remained as-is. ad7p1 was created using: #gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -s 10G -b 63 ad7=20 So it begins at sector #63, but physical 4096-block begins at logical secto= r 64. That's why I shifted gnop by 1 sector. > No, performance blows. :-( But this drive was bought primarily as backup solution. That is a good choi= ce according to your blog entry :-) > Yes. WD Green disks suck. Is it a problem of WD Green or it is common to all 4096-sector models? --=20 =D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC, =D0=98=D0=BB=D1=8C=D1=8F =D0=91=D0=B0=D0=BA=D1=83=D0=BB=D0=B8=D0=BD (ON Lab= s)