From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr 17 14:17:07 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA06480
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:17:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fps.biblos.unal.edu.co ([168.176.37.11])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA06447
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co
Received: from localhost by fps.biblos.unal.edu.co (AIX 4.1/UCB 5.64/4.03)
          id AA17950; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 16:15:35 -0500
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 16:15:35 -0500 (EST)
To: Alfred Perlstein <perlsta@fang.cs.sunyit.edu>
Cc: James Mansion <james@wgold.demon.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970417161633.14555A-100000@fang.cs.sunyit.edu>
Message-Id: <Pine.A41.3.95.970417161352.16892A-100000@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> > database server.  And you'd need a growth path beyond uniprocessor
> > Intel, which
> > free UNIXen (including Linux, as far as I'm concerned) don't have now.
> 
> freebsd doesn't have multiple intel processor support?
> is this true?
>
Yes, there is SMP support but it's still in an early stage to be
trustable.

Pedro.

> 
>