From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 23:03:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5646D16A50C for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F6043CD3 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 22:59:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kB6N0WiH059366 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kB6N0W3d059365; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:00:32 GMT Message-Id: <200612062300.kB6N0W3d059365@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: "Boris S." Cc: Subject: Re: kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0 device has detached X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Boris S." List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:03:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/106400; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Boris S." To: Volker Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, glebius@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0 device has detached Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:54:28 +0100 Volker schrieb: > As I understand your NAT gateway has just one NIC and you're using a > PPPoE pass-thru capable router? nearly, it's a DSL Modem, not a router. It speaks only PPPoE on the Ethernet. (acting like a router with PPPoE pass-thru) > If so, you may still be able to use one queue for local traffic and > one queue for external traffic (and sub-queues of both of course) on > your NIC. But that's a question of personal taste. If ALTQ works for > you your way, I would not effort a change. I'll probably not change, but I'm open for alternate configuration possibilities. Boris