From owner-cvs-all Sun Dec 9 1:28:34 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC9F37B405; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 01:28:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.freebsd.org (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fB99SCq51130; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 01:28:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.freebsd.org) To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Peter Wemm , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/telnet sys_bsd.c In-Reply-To: Message from "David O'Brien" of "Sun, 09 Dec 2001 01:25:12 PST." <20011209012512.A96804@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2001 01:28:12 -0800 Message-ID: <51125.1007890092@winston.freebsd.org> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hurm? Peter auto-generates the NFS sources nightly from a script? Whatever happened to the idea of having single copies of stuff? Are people cutting corners on implementation at the cost of sewing land-mines in our source tree? Sheesh, I leave you kids alone for a moment and you go and violate all the principles of good software engineering! :) - Jordan > On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 01:05:05AM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > > > > Now that I have swapped in Mark's instructions again, I have to wonder > > why nobody squealed at the time. What the hell? The idea behind this > > may make some sense, but the implementation does not. This is ugly as > > f**k! Has Mark lost his mind? > > He just followed what Peter did for NFS. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message