From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 04:03:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA9D1065670 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:03:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAD88FC21 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.carroll@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so592424ywe.13 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:03:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to :to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ii4zQQF5POrAQx9CPXp4cwV03KlYpny7hJ+uwP2Gn9o=; b=WG2P1xM4nFpQiiEAoIW1zAsF3s6oPG4msGvIj52TkYa06xGgKNFvcYgc5XvPG6Py8b 7dM40j9gWrLkeS4rouVzi+3ubzdzoF/ujZP8dWA5NT7v0sgsNICS82e4ddDhhSKoObwc srpgnKqmdV1enEUI1hGacBFLllyBEnaXfkevw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:references; b=H3KWirl/E6q/1JJpBrh1r+bkazs5uEN8EKwHv2kr5/Ov0MHsOoRuq7Z9lr9pngynOV gkHWszF0UPkBfU4bfRDJPargqCmNFs7RrJmYEHSRrkQ40jo2ZMBZLgLgvXR4sBDk2Moq LaxuE7cy8wteKc9XoGh7TsY7NO7ptnnmLiNrE= Received: by 10.150.216.3 with SMTP id o3mr5544263ybg.148.1229054584476; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:03:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.123.1 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:03:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8cb6106e0812112003s38233af6v8d324cf70eafc8fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 23:03:04 -0500 From: "Josh Carroll" To: pyunyh@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20081212035625.GN46707@cdnetworks.co.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081203090658.GJ9639@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081206023016.GF22093@cdnetworks.co.kr> <539c60b90812081127s4ffb509fnea9d44d4298da666@mail.gmail.com> <8cb6106e0812081252j2b0c8e78g4dcecf8d3770c269@mail.gmail.com> <8cb6106e0812101745l54b23a08k7fbeddeb605f88ea@mail.gmail.com> <20081212020539.GI46707@cdnetworks.co.kr> <8cb6106e0812111923l15f1f715g6f20f5925e1d471a@mail.gmail.com> <20081212034042.GL46707@cdnetworks.co.kr> <8cb6106e0812111951k18f4663ck2121b550dfe57322@mail.gmail.com> <20081212035625.GN46707@cdnetworks.co.kr> Cc: Steve Franks , current-list freebsd Subject: Re: Call for testers: Atheros AR8121(L1E)/AR8113/AR8114(L2E) ethernet X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: josh.carroll@gmail.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 04:03:05 -0000 > Yes, but msk(4) had hacks in e100phy(4) to enable flow-controls. > I don't want to add these hacks to all other drivers in tree. Thanks for the explanation! I certainly understand not wanting to put non-standard hacks into the code. I imagine the number of people affected by this is minimal (like I said, the overall throughput/performance was fine). I'll just consider getting a PCI-E em(4) in the future if the PCI bus begins to become a bottleneck for me, which is unlikely as I have no raid in any of the connected machines with gigE. Regards, Josh