From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 5 05:06:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911031065676 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 05:06:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndhertbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1D38FC0C for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2010 05:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so730518bwz.13 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:06:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lPVCrrfZYJ/GAYmlOmhhIPDnJxP0j3F9eAkQrXqGBYs=; b=gFSM/5qFnJIzexjw034AWyTbAt5Yhb7oOesqYVIOvyUj+vZqh6I7Yo81jwtl9wBAQw fYtgePa7zUW8Z1XAfd7VhsRLAAF59PFq7qCMoYAqrRN1jhR9I3mCbeH9KZVgqngDMHmK ACdlNb3VnUWVaharY/7OwG+78Z2HV0yxn6/QI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Qkltc/wo0KpPvloAX4IHDKy+KFtI6XeS/lUFvitw5wLLXSe0Wn8kl65rDRsNrVjFMK ISzy9OdjXMebCGV9ZEqXg+Sj2HYc+qCgXjBrdKqEDcJHK+Jt5rtqEn96dtausB+DxHcN ZPl0Q1DWPYQX4kXi/0VIGeKn2bsiXYRXhS5XE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.81.201 with SMTP id y9mr4637911bkk.144.1275714360602; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 22:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.46.100 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 22:06:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44wrue7j3q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <44wrue7j3q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 07:06:00 +0200 Message-ID: From: n dhert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: hal-0.5.14_7 to _8 upgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2010 05:06:02 -0000 > USB_GET_REPORT_ID should be getting picked up from > /usr/include/dev/usb/usb_ioctl.h these days. > Have you still got libusb (or some of its includes) installed on a > system recent enough to have it in the base system? On my system, I do have : ]$ ls -la /usr/include/dev/usb/usb_ioctl.h -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 9809 May 17 14:57 /usr/include/dev/usb/usb_ioctl.h On the other hand portupgrading always gives me: ---> ** Upgrade tasks 1: 0 done, 1 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ---> Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) - devel/libusb (marked as IGNORE) ! sysutils/hal (hal-0.5.14_7) (compiler error) It seems it still tries to do something with the devel/libusb port? $ pkg_info | grep libusb libusb-0.1.12_4 Library giving userland programs access to USB devices seems to show it is installed. My system started at 7.2 and was upgraded to 8.0 and has given this devel/libusb (marked as IGNORE) even since. If I look on a different system installed for the first time right with 8.0, $ pkg_info | grep libusb reports nothing. 2010/6/4 Lowell Gilbert > n dhert writes: > > > I have a problem with upgrading hal-0.5.14_7 to hal-0.5.14_8 > > > > how to solve this? > > --- > > cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../.. > > -DPACKAGE_SYSCONF_DIR=\""/usr/local/etc"\" -D > > PACKAGE_DATA_DIR=\""/usr/local/share"\" > > -DPACKAGE_BIN_DIR=\""/usr/local/bin"\" - > > DPACKAGE_LOCALE_DIR=\""/usr/local/share/locale"\" > > -DPACKAGE_LOCALSTATEDIR=\""/va > > r"\" -I../../.. -I/usr/local/include/dbus-1.0 > > -I/usr/local/include/dbus-1.0/incl > > ude -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall > > -Wchar-subscrip > > ts -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align > > -Wsign-c > > ompare -MT probe-hiddev.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/probe-hiddev.Tpo -c -o > > probe-hiddev. > > o probe-hiddev.c^M > > probe-hiddev.c: In function 'main':^M > > probe-hiddev.c:81: error: 'USB_GET_REPORT_ID' undeclared (first use in > this > > func > > tion)^M > > probe-hiddev.c:81: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only > > once^M > > probe-hiddev.c:81: error: for each function it appears in.)^M > > gmake[5]: *** [probe-hiddev.o] Error 1^M > > gmake[5]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14/hald/freebs > > d/probing'^M > > gmake[4]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1^M > > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > > `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14/hald/freebs > > d'^M > > gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1^M > > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14/hald'^M > > gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2^M > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14/hald'^M > > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1^M > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/hal/work/hal-0.5.14'^M > > gmake: *** [all] Error 2^M > > *** Error code 1^M > > ^M > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/hal.^M > > ---> Build of sysutils/hal ended at: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:09:33 +0200 > > (consumed > > 00:00:31) > > ---> Upgrade of sysutils/hal ended at: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:09:33 +0200 > > (consume > > d 00:00:31) > > USB_GET_REPORT_ID should be getting picked up from > /usr/include/dev/usb/usb_ioctl.h these days. > > Have you still got libusb (or some of its includes) installed on a > system recent enough to have it in the base system? >