Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 17:05:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Joe & Fhe Barbish <barbish@a1poweruser.com> Cc: FBSDQ <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: IPNAT frontend to IPFW Message-ID: <20020522170518.B69636@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGMEPCCAAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com>; from barbish@a1poweruser.com on Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:12:37PM -0400 References: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGMEPCCAAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:12:37PM -0400, Joe & Fhe Barbish wrote: > Now in moving to cable ISP access I wanted to keep my > IPFW advanced stateful keep-state rules firewall. > The work around suggested, is to use IPNAT. No, IPNAT is part of IPF and does not work with IPFW. natd(8) is the interface to IPFW's NAT implementation, which is also interfaced to by ppp's -nat flag. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE87DI9Wry0BWjoQKURAhg+AKChcKATqcR0yW1Vw07xn0MIGjGklQCbBkKR zfo/2OFHknONy43jwbS045s= =Qt+5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020522170518.B69636>