From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 30 17:16:04 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4420D4AF; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0.byshenk.net (portland1.byshenk.net [69.168.54.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BEF1AEB; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail0.byshenk.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id EC08422CE3; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:07:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 10:07:40 -0700 From: Greg Byshenk To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: svn commit: r264710 - head/sys/dev/ath Message-ID: <20140430170740.GA5964@mail0.byshenk.net> References: <201404210205.s3L25p9U064240@svn.freebsd.org> <20140421155853.GD1602@mail0.byshenk.net> <20140422005950.GE1602@mail0.byshenk.net> <20140422182107.GF1602@mail0.byshenk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140422182107.GF1602@mail0.byshenk.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:16:04 -0000 On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:21:07AM -0700, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:04:55AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > Try setting it up without 11n enabled: > > > > ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ath0 wlanmode hostap channel 6:g > > > > .. and if that doesn't help, try with 11n enabled but without ampdutx: > > > > ifconfig wlan0 -ampdutx > > > > I'm not using the AR5416 as an AP at the moment but it should be ok. > > I'm definitely using it as a station though. > > > > Can your try -HEAD instead? I don't plan on MFCing things myself back > > to stable/10; i rely on others who are actively using stable/10 to do > > it. > > I did try it to 11g (as I know that 11n wasn't supported before), > but it didn't help. > > I did -not- try without ampdutx. I can try that, and I can also > try HEAD --- but that will take a little bit of time, as I will > need to do some reconfiguring of other things to ensure that my > systems are up and available while I'm testing. > > I'll let you know when I have a chance to test. Just to update this for the record: my problem appears to have been a false alarm. Under heavy load yesterday, the same thing happened under 9-STABLE as I reported under 10-STABLE. My suspicion now is that the power supply is failing (or something similar) and it was just my testing under 10-STABLE that was pushing it too hard. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Portland, OR USA