From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 29 10: 8:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from windoze.tenebras.com (windoze.tenebras.com [216.15.43.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C6A37B99E for ; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:08:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kudzu@dnai.com) Received: from dnai.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by windoze.tenebras.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02756; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:07:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kudzu@dnai.com) Message-ID: <390B16D2.38EB927D@dnai.com> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:07:30 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio Reply-To: kudzu@tenebras.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: kudzu@tenebras.com, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Numerous broken ports References: <390B0B02.47368F2A@dnai.com> <20000429185756.A48372@mithrandr.moria.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > > WTF aren't you even checking this shit? > > They are checked. Every day, a script builds every port on FreeBSD, and > makes available the error messages should they fail. They shouldn't be included in the ports if they fail. There *is* a central point of distribution, and there should be some minimum quality requirement -- like, that it compiles? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message