Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 00:01:03 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: Matthew Rezny <matthew@reztek.cz>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion Message-ID: <20140524220103.GN2341@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20140524180557.GF2341@home.opsec.eu> References: <2318877.ATaMhzlr5B@desktop.reztek> <1521997.Va510XRLDQ@desktop.reztek> <534AD94A.2030105@marino.st> <2827292.qM76QHi0yk@workstation.reztek> <20140524180557.GF2341@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! > I agree that there was a lot of change in the ports tree recently. > But: There is a reason for this: The ports tree has to be cleaner > so that it can provide better automatic processes to the users. > It's not easy, but it's getting there. I found a presentation which really goes deep into the process and reasoning behind going to pkgng and staging: http://www.slideshare.net/VsevolodStakhov/new-solver-for-freebsd-pkg Very cool stuff. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 6 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140524220103.GN2341>