From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 02:46:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B7B1065673 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:46:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A137A8FC19 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18435 invoked by uid 0); 14 Nov 2011 21:46:02 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO glenbarber.us) (76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Nov 2011 21:46:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:45:57 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20111115024556.GA23021@glenbarber.us> References: <20111114083713.29fbecda@scorpio> <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111115022430.GA19970@magic.hamla.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: swills@FreeBSD.org, freebsd@beardz.net, pav@FreeBSD.org, eadler@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "postfix-current" broken on amd64 platform X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:46:03 -0000 --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:24:30PM -0500, Sahil Tandon wrote: > [ pav@ and those who tested mail/postifx-current on amd64 added to Cc: ] >=20 > On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 08:37:13 -0500, Jerry wrote: >=20 > > The "postfix-current" port is still marked as broken: > >=20 > > .if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64" > > BROKEN=3D fails during installation > > .endif > >=20 > > Since all previous releases of Postfix worked on FreeBSD, and since > > Postfix is/was developed on FreeBSD, I was wondering what the problem > > is with this release. Is there a possibility that this phenomena might > > be rectified in the near future? >=20 > Thanks for your report, Jerry. You are correct that FreeBSD is the main > development platform for Postfix. It seems that pointyhat's amd64 > machine throws an error during the install phase. Pav noticed this and > marked the port BROKEN; however, neither I nor a few others I've > enlisted can reproduce the error. Would you mind removing the > conditional that marks this port BROKEN, try to build/install in your > amd64 environment, and report the results?=20 >=20 > Pav, if nobody else can reproduce the error seen on pointyhat, can > portmgr look into whether there is something quirky with the amd64 > pointyhat machine? >=20 I don't have the successful build logs anymore, so I've just re-queued a build of postfix-current on 9-STABLE (-RC2) amd64 in my tinderbox if the results are of interest to those that can investigate any potential pointyhat anomalies. Regards, Glen --=20 Glen Barber | gjb@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Documentation Project --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJOwdJkAAoJEFJPDDeguUajheMIALt7jK6luOL5XhyF0vdwvfo1 ked7VBdc1qcMhSzLA7Opn51lJ1M6eB8RHvQqwZJemtFDvYfyd5EvUw5/MDSItJ9U wDvWAXvaIHBoK1XIixcyuDWVyjon+lDra/vT7YFjM3OCAz0//Klg9PhK246ESYmM 7z94BGTrkHyvr9FyyGyUGsoPAp7mg+5YYTqcedPkdfYEAvwmGG6EXQ+UH40LwIVO za5bu3Qm0NYbK8tM9XEjDwQ58GO4DDFW0+QPBI4Bn8u09do6zWRnbhyza2pIhUck VW83xf0oVt6gMBI0vubQd/DnWjh94Z9pms2mGffLtx+4HouTNz2GpH2A5GTmoNs= =rLxP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm--