From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Apr 17 14:27:37 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA07242
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (hal-ns1-50.netcom.ca [207.181.94.114])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA07236
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 14:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thelab.hub.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelab.hub.org (8.8.5/8.8.2) with SMTP id SAA06339; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 18:26:17 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 18:26:17 -0300 (ADT)
From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Alfred Perlstein <perlsta@fang.cs.sunyit.edu>
cc: James Mansion <james@wgold.demon.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Price of FreeBSD (was On Holy Wars...)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970417161633.14555A-100000@fang.cs.sunyit.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96.970417182527.4592h-100000@thelab.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> > database server.  And you'd need a growth path beyond uniprocessor
> > Intel, which
> > free UNIXen (including Linux, as far as I'm concerned) don't have now.
> 
> freebsd doesn't have multiple intel processor support?
> is this true?

	nope, SMP support is alive and well in 3.0+. I believe its 
integrated as part of 3.0+...isn't it?  But we've had SMP capabilities
through patches since at least 2.2

Marc G. Fournier                                
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org