From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 12 13:42:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C65106566C for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FB18FC1C for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7199F2EB95C; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:42:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:42:21 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: W/3zPknK82HBAX+Vb5zgYaf/Agpy6Du+qA+lMkAiWf+b 1236865341 Received: from anglepoise.lon.incunabulum.net (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D98CF18B88; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:42:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49B9113B.8070306@incunabulum.net> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:42:19 +0000 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Sparrevohn References: <49B885A1.9000907@incunabulum.net> <20090312043239.GE25538@weongyo.cdnetworks.kr> <49B89C70.4020504@incunabulum.net> <200903121140.53652.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> In-Reply-To: <200903121140.53652.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IGMPv3 hot interface detach panics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:42:23 -0000 Thomas Sparrevohn wrote: > ... > I am getting a panic as well - but I am not sure its related > > Looks like inm is NULL at line 1706 in igmp.c Can you confirm this by inspecting the core dump? i.e. frame 9 print inm gcc has inlined the functions at this point. It may be a symptom of a race. Can you reproduce what the system was doing at the time? thanks, BMS