From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 06:47:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9ED01E3 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smadev.internal.net (adsltrust.ath.forthnet.gr [194.219.204.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4431E237F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smadev.internal.net (smadev [10.9.200.131]) by smadev.internal.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAC6lFNr063677; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:47:17 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com) Message-ID: <5281CEF3.1050904@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:47:15 +0200 From: Achilleas Mantzios User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: George Neville-Neil Subject: Re: eclipse-devel Juno -> Kepler References: <5280FF22.50502@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:47:23 -0000 On 11/11/2013 18:42, George Neville-Neil wrote: > On Nov 11, 2013, at 8:00 , Achilleas Mantzios wrote: > >> Hallo, >> 1st off thanx for the efforts for eclipse the port all those years. >> Are there any plans to port Kepler (Eclipse 4.3) in the near future? >> Just took a look at the Juno patches (pheww... doable but lots of work). >> > A few of us have talked about it, but it is, indeed, a lot of work. > > That being said we do need a plan. My original idea was to retire > the current eclipse port and move eclipse-devel over to be just eclipse. > Then we could get started on doing a new eclipse-devel which would > be 4.3, or, perhaps 4.4 Thanx for the input. That would be great news. > > Best, > George > > -- Achilleas Mantzios