From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 2 3:20:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C57314DF2 for ; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 03:20:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.freebsd.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA50508; Sun, 2 Jan 2000 12:20:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Karl Denninger Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xntpd - VERY old folks, how about updating? :-) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Jan 2000 19:42:10 CST." <20000101194210.A17585@Denninger.Net> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2000 12:20:35 +0100 Message-ID: <50506.946812035@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000101194210.A17585@Denninger.Net>, Karl Denninger writes: >> >> Anyway, ntpd4 is in CURRENT... >> > >> >Now it is. >> > >> >And it works correctly too. >> >> In general yes, but not if you use the hardpps() with a refclock, >> it works better after I fixed a couple of almost-mutually-canceling >> sign-bugs, but the parameters of the hardpps() PLL relative to the >> FLL are wrong. > >You're still a bunch of revs back - the current is either "h" or "i", and it >has a bunch of fixes (including one here, I think) No, the NTP distribution doesn't contain the kernel code, it only interfaces to it. I'm sure Ollivier will upgrade us every so often now :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message